Bond Market Perspectives | Week of September 29, 2014

posted 10/2/2014 in Investments

Highlights

  • Multiple factors, none of them fundamental, have driven high-yield bond prices weaker in September.
  • Performance versus investment-grade bonds is approaching an extreme and may signal a reversal.

Late Summer Setback

The end of summer has been less than kind to the high-yield bond market. A challenging month of
September for the bond market has witnessed high-yield bonds lag several of their fixed income
counterparts. Lacking a fundamental catalyst, such as reduced profitability or weak economic data, performance has been driven by a series of technical and psychological factors, making current weakness more frustrating for investors.

A confluence of events conspired against the high-yield bond market in a difficult September,
including:

New issue surge. New issuance for the four weeks ending September 26, 2014, was the
heaviest four-week stretch in 2014. Although making up for the typical low-volume summer
months, the flood of new supply created a significant headwind for the high-yield market
[Figure 1].

Weak stock markets. When economically sensitive investments such as stocks sell off,
high-yield bonds also feel the impact. However, last week's stock market downdraft
witnessed an above-average impact to high-yield bonds. In fact, high-yield bonds have
underperformed stocks during the month of September 2014, which is unusual during a
down month for stocks. Either stock weakness was too shallow or the high-yield market
overreacted. The coming weeks may clarify.

Fed tapering fears. The Federal Reserve (Fed) is on track to end bond purchases at the
end of October 2014. Investors fear the absence of the Fed's liquidity in the high-yield bond
market and have pushed high-yield bond prices lower.Geopolitical fears. An escalation of tensions in Syria with the start of airstrikes added an element of uncertainty, which more economically sensitive investors tend to react more negatively to.

China growth concerns. The Chinese central bank's cash injection to the five largest
Chinese banks in mid-September was viewed as the equivalent of an interest rate cut. The
news, viewed as a response to a slowing economy, sparked China growth worries.

Approaching quarter end. Month end can spur buying of higher-quality assets as
companies look to boost quality for reporting purposes. Weakness in Europe and Japan, in
particular, is driving demand for higher-quality bonds. The approach of quarter end coupled
with a strong bounce back in high-yield bonds during August may have provided an
opportune time for some investors to take profits during September.

Low inflation. Low inflation in the United States and the lowest inflation readings in
Europe since the end of the financial crisis, in addition to Chinese growth fears, have added
to concerns about economic growth and the ability of lower-rated companies to meet their
debt obligations.

High-yield bond outflows have not been a major driver of recent weakness. Although flows into
high-yield funds and exchange-traded funds (ETF) are negative month to date, they are much lower compared with the heavy outflows witnessed in July through early August 2014.

High-yield bonds have not only lagged stocks during September 2014, but also a notable gap has
developed versus their high-quality counterparts in the investment-grade corporate bond market.

logical reaction to fears over corporate credit quality would likely see higher-quality corporate debt lag proportionately to lower-rated corporate debt. After all, economic fears should have an impact across all corporate debt issuers, but September's downdraft has so far impacted high-yield bonds much more.

Relative performance of high-yield bonds compared with investment-grade corporate bonds is
approaching an extreme [Figure 2] and subject to a reversal. Over the last two years, the rolling
four-week total return of high-yield bonds relative to investment-grade corporate bonds has matched or exceeded negative 1% on six occasions. Current underperformance is approaching this zone and history has shown that while it may be exceeded, such disparities rarely last as value-oriented buyers tend to step in and buy to help reverse performance. Over the past three weeks (not pictured), high-yield bonds have underperformed investment-grade corporate bonds by over 1%, a situation occurring only three other times over the past two years.

Extremes do not necessarily ensure positive absolute returns. If all bond prices decline, then the
relative performance of high-yield bonds may improve if prices merely fall less sharply than
investment-grade bonds. But the numerous factors mentioned above have created a valuation gap
compared with other fixed income sectors. If the market were truly concerned with credit quality
fears, a proportionate lag among investment-grade corporate bonds would have also likely occurred, but it did not.

Although short-term forces may push high-yield bond valuations cheaper still, it is unlikely to extend significantly further absent renewed deterioration in high-yield bond fundamentals. On that score, fundamental indicators remain positive:

A low default environment persists. The most recently released Fed Senior Loan Officer
Survey continues to indicate a greater number of banks easing lending requirements. A
tightening of lending conditions usually precedes a notable increase in defaults by 12 to 18
months.

The U.S. economy continues to expand. Following a 4.6% increase during the secondquarter of 2014, our research indicates the economy is tracking to slightly greater than 3%
growth during the third quarter. Such economic growth is likely to bolster companies' ability
to repay debt obligations. Third quarter 2014 earnings reporting season begins in just over a
week and will provide a better glimpse. Another mid- to high single-digit increase in
corporate earnings growth would further support corporate credit quality.

Now cheaper valuations, in addition to fundamental factors, may also support the sector. The
average yield spread has increased to 4.8% and the average yield has increased back above 6.0% to 6.3%, its highest level of 2014 [Figure 3]. While the high-yield market can be a leading indicator, we await confirmation in upcoming economic data and earnings season before drawing conclusions from the recent pullback, which we view as driven more by short-term, technical factors. In a world of high valuations across the bond market, we still find high-yield bonds attractive.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to
provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s)
may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance
reference is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment.

The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values and yields
will decline as interest rates rise, and bonds are subject to availability and change in price.

The U.S. Corporate High-Yield Index measures the market of USD-denominated, non-investmengrade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bonds. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody's, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below, excluding emerging market debt.

The U.S. Corporate Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S.
dollar-denominated, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. It includes USD-denominated
securities publicly issued by U.S. and non-U.S. industrial, utility, and financial issuers that meet
specified maturity, liquidity, and quality requirements.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.

To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent
investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no
representation with respect to such entity.

Not FDIC or NCUA/NCUSIF Insured | No Bank or Credit Union Guarantee | May Lose Value | Not
Guaranteed by Any Government Agency | Not a Bank/Credit Union Deposit

Tracking # 1-312796 (Exp. 09/15)The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.

The financial consultants of Wealth Management are registered representatives with and Securities are offered through LPL Financial. Member FINRA/SIPC. Insurance products offered through LPL Financial or its licensed affiliates.

Not FDIC/NCUA Insured Not Bank/Credit Union
Guaranteed May Lose Value
Not Insured by any Federal Government Agency Not a Bank Deposit

This newsletter was created using Newsletter OnDemand, powered by Wealth Management Systems Inc.

Blog and News
BrokerCheck